A Prospect From Mount Olivet

  One of the most important eschatological passages in the Bible is Jesus Christ’s great prophecy concerning “the end of the age.”  This prophecy was issued on two distinct occasions.  The first (recorded in Luke 21) was when Jesus Christ taught the people in the temple (Luke 20: 1), whereas the second (recorded in Matthew 24 & Mark 13) was spoken privately to Peter, James, John, and Andrew as they sat upon the Mount of Olives (Mark 13: 3). 

  In order to understand Christ’s prophecy, one must harmonize the two discourses.  We are prepared to show that the prophecy spoken in the temple concerns the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 and the dispersion of the Jews until the end of the present age; while the great bulk of Christ’s Olivet Discourse speaks of the “Great Tribulation” which will fall out after the Jews have been gathered into their own land.  

  So far as the two discourses start out, Luke 21: 8-9 is parallel with Matthew 24: 4-6 and Mark 13: 5-7.  Christ predicts the rise of false Messiahs and deceivers, and wars and rumors of wars which must come to pass. Then He describes nations rising against nations, earthquakes famines and pestilences in diverse places (Luke 21: 10-11; Matt. 24: 7-8; Mark 13: 8).  In the Olivet Discourse Christ affirms that “these are the beginning of sorrows” (Matt. 24: 8; Mark 13: 8).  In other words, these signs are the beginning of the Great Tribulation.

   In the temple discourse, however, Christ makes a transition.  After predicting the earthquakes, famines, pestilences, and fearful sights and great signs from heaven (Luke 21: 11), our Lord does not say “these are the beginning of sorrows,” but stops short and goes back to introduce a parenthesis describing events which would take place “before all these” beginnings of sorrows. 

   This parenthesis occupies verses 12-24 of Luke’s discourse, and carries us from the destruction of Jerusalem and the Jewish dispersion until the close of the Great Tribulation and Christ’s coming in the clouds of heaven; whereas the Olivet Discourse deals with events which would transpire during and immediately following the Great Tribulation (Matt. 24: 9-30; Mark 13: 9-26).  The two discourses synchronize once more with the description of Christ’s parousia (Luke 21: 25-27; Matt. 24: 29-30; Mark 13: 24-26).

  The dispersion passages in Luke 21 are of the highest import, for Preterists (and even some Futurists) affirm that verses 20-24were fulfilled during the long period of devastation that occurred from A.D. 69 to A.D. 135, when the city was finally broken up and all the Jews driven out, thus fulfilling the curses of Deuteronomy 28

   However, a mistake arises from not seeing that this whole period of the Jewish dispersion was to last until the “times of the Gentiles” were fulfilled (Luke 21: 24).  Then the Jews would be regathered to their own land for remedial purposes, and after the rise of Antichrist, the Great Tribulation would commence.  This is the event prophesied in Christ’s Olivet Discourse, and not the period of the Jewish dispersion.

  A few Scriptures will be needed to bring this out.  Firstly, Moses predicted in Deuteronomy 28: 59 that the plagues of Israel would be “of long continuance.”  Then, in Deuteronomy 30: 1-10 he held out God’s continued promise to restore blessings to Israel on the condition of national repentance.  This promise would hold good during the entire duration of their dispersion in the lands of the heathen (30: 1).  The “long continuance” of the dispersion must therefore occupy the period known as “the times of the Gentiles.”

  Secondly, when in His Olivet Discourse Christ predicted the “abomination of desolation” (Matt. 24: 15; Mark 13: 14), He was pointing His very finger to the time of Antichrist’s persecution.  For the passage Christ refers to is Daniel 11: 31, where Antichrist is described as taking away the daily sacrifice and placing the abomination that maketh desolate. 

   This prediction coincides with those of Daniel 8: 13, 9: 27, and 12: 11.  All of these verses speak of the period of Antichrist’s power, which will last until the “time of the end” when the sanctuary shall be cleansed (Dan. 8: 14).  The 2,300 days mentioned by Daniel in 8: 14 begin exactly 220 days after the commencement of the 70th week of Daniel, ending at the close of the week; while the “midst of the week” is that point when the daily sacrifice will be taken away and the “abomination that maketh desolate” set up.  The remaining 42 months given to Antichrist to afflict the saints brings the prophecy up to the time of the end (Daniel 7: 25; 9: 27; 12: 7; Revelation 13: 5).  This 42 month period fills up the “Great Tribulation” mentioned in Christ’s Olivet Discourse.

  A careful study of Daniel 12 only confirms this.  For the chapter opens with the phrase “at that time” (Dan. 12: 1), thus marking the predictions that follow to be a continuation of those given in Daniel 11.  Daniel records that at that time there shall be a period of “trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time” (Dan. 12: 1).  Compare closely with Matthew 24: 21, where Christ, after warning the Jews to flee when they see the “abomination of desolation stand in the holy place” (24: 15) says: “For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be” (Matt. 24: 21).

  Christ is speaking of the same period denoted by Daniel as at that time, when Antichrist shall have “planted the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain” (Dan. 11: 45).  This evidence presents an insuperable barrier to Preterists, who must place fulfillment of the predictions of Daniel 11: 21-45 in the seven years preceding the destruction of the Jewish temple by Titus.

   So far, we are not aware of any Preterists who have attempted this Herculean feat.  However, knowing their methods of blandly vaporizing the Scriptures, such text-jockeying would hardly surprise us.  Only keep in mind, however, that almost all commentators see the “vile person” of Daniel 11: 21-35 as Antiochus Epiphanes (an aknowledged “type” of Antichrist), while verses 36-45 of the same chapter are generally regarded as yet unfulfilled.

  As a third and final proof that the Olivet Discourse describes the events following the regathering of Israel, we appeal to Ezekiel 22: 15-22, in which the prophet predicts a regathering of the Jewish people into Jerusalem for remedial purposes.  The whole context of the prophecy places this after the dispersion (v. 15-16 ff.).  Thus, the dispersion and the regathering are two unique events, separated by a long period of time in which the Gentiles are gathered into the church.

  Of course, we could give much more evidence in support of our view that events of the Olivet Discourse are yet future.  We could allude to verses such as Zechariah 14: 2-4, in which Messiah’s return is described as co-ordinate with the destruction of those enemies which fight against Jerusalem.  Or, referring to the same prophet, we might show from Zech. 12: 9-10 that the same events are accompanied by a Jewish national conversion, thus fulfilling Christ’s own promise that, “ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye say, Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord” (Matt. 23: 39).

  Suffice it to say that any interpretation of Christ’s end-time prophecy which fails to harmonize the two discourses with the plain testimony of the Old Testament prophets, can only result in a blindness and confusion as great as that which hindered the Scribes and Pharisees from perceiving the truth. Although this is a brief and cursory study, I am hoping that it will help lead others into the right paths of prophetic interpretation.

6 Comments Add yours

  1. Bingo! One of the big issues that has to be resolved is to the see the difference between the temple discourse and the Olivet Discourse. One we see that, we can concede the things that were fulfilled in the past (Preterist) and affirm the things that remain future. Great Post.

    Have fun and stay busy – Luke 19:13

    -The Orange Mailman

  2. Hi Darrin,

    Thanks for the kind words! Yes, we need to distinguish between the two discourses. I think that ‘parenthesis’ in Luke 21 is a key. Plus, there is the reference in Matt. 24: 15 to Daniel 11: 31 & 12: 11 which can’t be brushed aside. I think this is powerful evidence that the Olivet Discourse speaks of future events.

    Peace & Health,

    Brian

  3. Theolog says:

    Hello the Jews were already restored to the land but they had become gentiles by adopting the ways of Babylon.

    Clearly the New Covenant is now a reality. That same Christ has returned by his holy spirit living in us and all that know Him see him. Believers have become the living temple of God. Christ in us is our hope of glory.

    Hello again, The Book was written to them, in “their generation” about events that were to happen to them in “their generation”. Those things were either true to them or not true at all. The arrogance of those that think the events were to happen in the future, in particular in “their generation” is quite unbelievable.

    Kind of like Philo’s 1 million ways to interpret Genesis. LOL

  4. Theolog,

    No, the Bible was written to the JEWISH NATION, which will remain a nation as long as the sun and moon endure.

    “This generation” means “the Jewish nation.” The audience of the Old Testament is ‘the Jews.’ The audience of the New Testament is ‘the saints.’

    Matt. 24 is not talking about A.D. 70, but the ‘consummation of the age.’ See Dan. 11: 31-45 for more info.

    Peace & Health,

    Brian

  5. Theolog says:

    Every thing I have ever read says that Matthew was written to the Jewish Christians.

    NO! Nation means nation and generation means generation.

    I cannot find a single transulation that uses the word “generation”.

    You are changing the bible and teaching others that you can change any word you want to fit your ideas. Bad idea.

  6. Theolog,

    Yes, Matthew was written to Jewish Christians. But remember, when the Jewish nation formally rejected the Messiah, the Gospel was sent to the Gentiles.

    ‘This generation’ definitely means ‘the Jewish people.’ The more I study this view, the more it makes sense.

    For instance, Christ tells the Jewish nation that He won’t return until they repent and say “blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord” (Matt. 23: 39).

    Well, according to the Old Testament, when the Jewish nation repents, Christ comes back to destroy all those nations that fight against Jerusalem (Zech. 12: 9-14; 14: 1-4).

    The Jewish nation never repented in A.D. 70, nor were the Roman armies destroyed. This seems to argue against the view that our Lord was only addressing the people of His own day. When He says, “This generation,” He is referring to the nation of Israel.

    Peace & Health,

    Brian

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s