Essays On Chiliasm (Part 10)

   By studying the eschatological writings of the early Fathers, and diligently comparing their several descriptions, it is not impossible to put together something like a composite view of end-time events.  In our last article, we discussed the Great Apostasy, briefly touching upon its general character.  Now we must discuss the rise of Antichrist.  Looking back through a number of early writings, it seems that the church always, from day one, held an expectation that some such personage would arrive on the scene in the last days of the world’s history.  In recent years, however, the doctrine of Antichrist has been pronounced a fable; and since that time, rationalistic theologians have tried to relegate this mysterious individual to the pages of past history.  But it won’t do.  No person in history has ever matched with the delineations given in Scripture of Antichrist; or, if some parallels be found, the discrepancies are too great to admit of any assent. 

   One common view among modern Bible-critics is that Nero was the Antichrist.  But, there is no trustworthy evidence that Nero’s infamous persecution ever extended beyond Rome itself.  This alone makes the theory highly unlikely; and only a headstrong enthusiast would maintain it in absence of any proof beyond an assumption.  Withal, the persecution of Antichrist is to be waged during the last half-week (i.e., three-and-a-half years) of the present age, which period will close with the coming of Jesus Christ in glory.  These data do not match up with the Roman emperor.  Nero was never “destroyed with the brightness of the Lord’s coming” (2 Thess. 2: 8),  nor “taken, and cast alive into the lake of fire” (Rev. 19: 20).  In fact, he committed suicide in A.D. 68. Nor did he ever sit in the temple at Jerusalem, boasting himself as God.  Obviously, he is not the man we are looking for.

   In all events, we must have recourse to the proper fountains, and study the ancient church fathers.  For they, leaning back to Apostolic tradition, had greater knowledge of these matters than ourselves.  One of the earliest allusions to Antichrist is contained in the Didache, or “Teaching of the Twelve Apostles.”  In this primitive document, he is referred to as “the world deceiver” (ho kosmoplanos).  The full text reads: “For in the last days, false prophets and corrupters shall be multiplied, and the sheep shall be turned into wolves, and love shall be turned into hate; for when lawlessness increaseth, they shall hate and persecute and betray one another, and then shall appear the world deceiver as Son of God, and shall do signs and wonders, and the earth shall be delivered into his hands, and he shall do iniquitous things which have never yet come to pass since the beginning.” (xvi. 3-5).  This prediction certainly approximates more closely to the truth.  That Antichrist is to exercise his power over the entire world, is evident from various passages of Scripture.

   But who is he? From whence does he come?  What are his origins?  Is he a man, as many believe?–or the devil incarnate?  We shall discuss these matters to the best of our ability.  Nearly all orthodox writers describe his advent as occurring at a time of great worldwide discord and calamity.  We’ve already seen how the Apostasy creates conditions favorable for a shattering of worldwide peace, and that numerous wars and rumors of wars must first take place before Antichrist comes on the scene.  The Apostasy will pave the way for his appearance. Lest we be carried away by conjecture, however, let us study the visions and interpretations of the prophet Daniel.  For his accounts are the best starting-point for learning of the times of Antichrist.

   We’ll remember King Nebuchadnezzar’s vision, wherein he saw the great image depicting the prominent world kingdoms from his time to Christ’s coming in glory.  Daniel says: “Thou, O king, sawest, and behold a great image.  This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before thee; and the form thereof was terrible.  This image’s head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass, his legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay.  Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces.  Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing-floors.  And the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth” (Dan. 2: 31-35). 

   Daniel then gives us the exposition.  He tells Nebuchadnezzar: “Thou art this head of gold.  And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.  And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.  And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters’ clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.  And as the toes of the feet were part of iron and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.  And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.  And in the days of these kings, shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever (Dan. 2: 38-44).

   While Daniel does not identify the successive kingdoms by name, he nonetheless gives an accurate account of those mighty nations that would follow Babylon in dominion of the world.  Most commentators agree that the head of gold represents Babylon; the breast and arms, the Medes and Persians; the belly and thighs of brass, the Grecians; while the legs of iron stand for the Roman empire.  When we come to feet of iron and clay, however, opinions are divided.  Some early expositors believe that the feet represent the Roman empire at its very close.  Thus from the beginning there was a strong tradition that Christ would come at the dissolution of the Roman Empire.  But, if we look carefully at Daniel’s interpretation, we’ll perceive that Daniel only attributes the quality of strength to the iron of the feet.  Thus, if the legs represent the Romans, the feet must partake of the power of that empire.  This does not necessarily argue for the identity of the legs and the feet.  At any rate, Daniel’s vision of the great stone breaking the image to pieces predicts a time when human governments will be brought to nothing by the Kingdom of Christ. 

   The feet, then, must represent the last kingdom which shall bear rule over all the world before Christ returns.  It shall be one empire divided into ten nations.  Interestingly, Hippolytus identifies these ten nations as democracies.  If we take his view, it is quite reasonable to assume that the ten nations will be held together by the strength of a Rome-like administration.  Howbeit, because of the wide intermixture of various ethnic and cultural classes (represented by the clay) it shall not cleave together.  That is, there will be no common interest among the several toes.  This I think is the best, or at least the most credible, exposition of Daniel’s vision.  Of course, we cannot be absolutely certain.  But one thing is sure.  The world must first be re-organized into ten nations, ere Daniel’s prophecy of the feet can be fulfilled.  How will this take place?  Who knows.  Perhaps this preliminary division of the world will be preceded by a Third World War, or some such upheaval so great as to break down the structures of national governments.  It is too early to tell.

   However,  this division will clear the way for Antichrist.  And it is here that we must refer to Daniel’s vision of the four beasts, which in many particulars lines up with his vision of the great image.  In Daniel 7: 3-8, the prophet sees four beasts rising out of the ground.  The first is like a lion, having eagles wings.  This has been identified as the Babylonian empire.  After this arises another beast, like a bear.  This was the Persian empire.  Then Daniel sees a third beast, like unto a leopard, with four wings.  This can be none other than the Grecian power, which after Alexander the Great’s death was partitioned into four empires.  Following the leopard Daniel sees a fourth beast, “dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.  And I considered the horns, and behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things” (Dan. 7: 7-8). 

   Almost all the early commentators agree that the ten horns of the fourth beast parallel the ten toes of the image, while the “little horn” represents Antichrist.  Hippolytus, harmonizing Daniel’s visions, writes: “As these things, then, are destined to come to pass, and as the toes of the image turn out to be democracies, and the ten horns of the beast are distributed among ten kings, let us look at what is before us more carefully, and scan, as it were, with open eye.  The ‘golden head’ of the image is identical with the ‘lioness,’ by which the Babylonians were represented.  ‘The golden shoulders and arms of silver’ are the same with the ‘bear,’ by which the Persians and Medes are meant.  ‘The belly and thighs of brass’ are the ‘leopard,’ by which the Greeks who ruled from Alexander onwards are intended.  The ‘legs of iron’ are the ‘dreadful and terrible beast,’ by which the Romans who now hold the empire are meant.  The ‘toes of clay and iron’ are the ‘ten horns’ which are to be.  The ‘one other little horn’ springing up in their midst is the ‘antichrist.’  The stone that ‘smites the image and breaks it in pieces,’ and that fills the whole earth, is Christ, who comes from heaven and brings judgment on the world.” (Fragments from Commentaries, II. iii).

   With the sole exception of his identification of the fourth beast as the Roman empire, I agree on the whole with Hippolytus’ interpretation.  If we concede, then, that the little horn represents the Antichrist, it will be a relatively simple matter to form some notion of end-time events.  Firstly, the world must be divided into ten nations.  Then, Antichrist shall arise as a great political leader.  He shall subdue and conquer three of the nations, and will probably be constituted the head of the entire confederacy.  But, we are going too far.  We must back up a little and try, if we can, to get some idea of the personal character of this Antichrist.  From whence does he arise?  Is he a Jew or a Gentile? Interestingly, this latter question seems to be a hot topic of debate among students of prophecy.  Some are for maintaining his Jewish origins, whilst others proclaim him to be of pure Gentile extraction.  What do we think?

   The opinion of the early church was that Antichrist would arise from among the Jews, and be hailed as their Messiah.  Moreover, it was believed that he would draw his lineage from the tribe of Dan.  The evidence in support of this view is fetched mainly from Jeremiah 8: 16, where the prophet writes: “The snorting of his horses was heard from Dan; the whole land trembled at the sound of the neighing of his strong ones: for they have come, and have devoured the land, and all that is in it; the city, and those that dwell therein.”  Another proof-text is Gen. 49: 16-17: “Dan shall judge his people, as one of the tribes of Israel.  Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse-heels, so that his rider shall fall backward.”  Then, too, there is the likening of Dan to a lion, in imitation of the true Lion, Christ.  Moses writes: “Dan is a lion’s whelp: he shall leap from Bashan” (Deut. 33: 22).  Thus, there is strong support for the view that Antichrist will rise from among the Jews, and constitute himself as their leader.

   Moreover, it is likely that he is the one who shall rebuild the temple at Jerusalem.  For his crowing act of iniquity will be to sit in the temple of God and demand divine worship (2 Thess. 2: 4; cf. Isa. 14: 13-14).  But, we ask, when shall these events take place?  It is evident that they shall be fulfilled in the last half-week of the world’s history.  That is, when the first half of Daniel’s 70th week has expired, Antichrist shall arise and deceive all mankind.  He shall function for three years and six months, after which he will be brought to nothing.  The first half of the week will be taken up by the two witnesses, Enoch and Elijah, who shall preach the Gospel unto all nations, exhorting men to turn from their iniquities and embrace the way of life.  These matters are related more fully in John’s Apocalypse, and may be verified by comparing Rev. 11: 1-7 with Rev. 13: 1-7

   Again, hearken to Hippolytus: “Thus, then, does the prophet [Daniel] set forth these things concerning Antichrist, who shall be shameless, a war-maker, and despot, who, exalting himself above all kings and above every God, shall build the city of Jerusalem and restore the sanctuary.  Him the impious shall worship as God, and will bend to him the knee, thinking him to be Christ.  He shall cut off the two witnesses and forerunners of Christ, who proclaim his glorious kingdom from heaven, as it is said: ‘And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth.’  As also it was announced to Daniel: ‘And one week shall confirm a covenant with many; and in the midst of the week it shall be that the sacrifice and oblation shall be removed’–that the one week might be shown to be divided into two.  The two witnesses, then, shall preach three years and a half; and Antichrist shall make war upon the saints during the rest of the week, and desolate the world, that what is written may be fulfilled: ‘And they shall make the abomination of desolation for a thousand two hundred and ninety days.'”  (Fragments from Commentaries, II. xxxix).

   This gives us a tolerably clear picture of what shall occur during the last seven years of the world’s history; that is, prior to Christ’s coming in glory to establish His throne among us, and to rebuke iniquity.  And our Lord Himself, in His Olivet Discourse, foretells all the events which shall lead up to His coming.  As related in our last article, the Apostasy must first break out.  Although we feel that the beginnings of the Apostasy have arrived, we have not yet seen the persecutions and betrayals (Matt. 24: 9-10) that shall follow in its wake.  Only a calamitous state of the world could give rise to such conditions as pave the way for these tragic events.  And what more likely than that a Third World War should occur to shatter the comity of nations?  We believe that such an event is not unreasonable, considering the perturbed state of present-day politics.  And that two such wars have already occurred, do not render it improbable that a repeat event, on a larger and more disastrous scale, may become a reality.  And then only will the long-contested Apocalyptic imagery have its true fulfillment.

To be continued…

4 Comments Add yours

  1. Hello. I have been following your series here. I am a PreMillennialist. I will be interested in your future posts perhaps clarifying this statement.

    “With the sole exception of his identification of the fourth beast as the Roman empire, I agree on the whole with Hippolytus’ interpretation.”

    I am a proponent that the fourth beast is both the Old Roman Empire and an end times empire withing the boundaries of the Old Roman Empire, both East and West divisions included. The dragon that tried to devour Messiah has the same structure (seven heads and ten horns) as the antichrist’s kingdom of Revelation 13.

    Have fun and stay busy – Luke 19:13

    -The Orange Mailman

  2. Hi,

    Thanks for that input. You may very well be correct! It makes sense. I haven’t fished too deeply into Revelation. Right now I’m just following the old theologians. However, I tend to believe that the events themselves will provide the key. Some folks see the beast and false prophet as ‘Rome Imperial’ and ‘Rome Papal.’ So that would make Antichrist the pope. Of course that view has only been around for a few hundred years, but it presents an awesome challenge, as there are so many parallels between the pope and the Bible depictions of Antichrist. At any rate, as I continue to study I’ll keep all these views handy for reference.

    Peace and Health,

    Brian

  3. Brian says:

    Some teach that the 10 horns are 10 successive resurrections of the Roman Empire…including the Ostrogoths…to Garibaldi/Italy (9th horn) then the final 10th horn…which would consist of the 10 toes/10 final nations.

    Is it possible that the 10 are successive/chronological resurrections- that they arise “out” of the the Beast?

  4. JOHN V!! says:

    I believe we have incorrectly been taught the meaning of Rev.13 and 17. Therefore, all follow the same thought patterns because all have resigned to the same understanding. I believe Rev.13 speaks of a system more so than an individual. We in this present time have seen several events transpire that now seemed to present a more lucid understanding of prohpecy fulfillment. Therefore, in these days we should be cognizant of happenings around us more so than interpretations of the misunderstanding by men (in the generic sense) who have now departed from the scene of observation! Regardless of our admiration of these men or those alive who follow their same pattern, out of admiration. We have the greater responsibility to grasp God’s Word through observation of those things appearing on the scene and a clear discernment of the correct direction through God the Holy Spirit. (Rev.13) only lines up with (Rev.17) if it is observed as a system. This system explains the meaning of the seven heads, the seven kings and the eighth. I am limited in a detailed explanation but will seek to explan in a terse manner. Communism ruled in Russia from (1917-1991) taking on the name of the Soviet Union. Seven major rulers, kings were the makeup of seven rulers, kings, of that kingdom (mountains, administrations) of that system. They were: 1.Lenin, 2.Stalin, 3.Khrushev, 4.Brezhnev, 5.Andropov, 6.Chernenko (he was old and sickly and ruled but a few mos). This is the meaning of the words “And there are seven kings: five have fallen, and one is,”(Rev.17:10) and the other has not yet come and when he comes he must rule a short space. The Word seeks to reveal the discripancy of the sixth one, from the seventh one, who comes to rule a short space. Therefore, the sixth seems to be in dispute as to who the sixth one is. Therefore, because of his (Chernenko) infirmities and lack of complete power; actually the sixth one becomes Gorbachev. The seventh was 7.Yeltsin. It states the seventh ruled a short space. Remember what the Word is seeking to reveal here: A System, an atheistic system (Rev.13:5-6) a Communist system in Russia, the (Bear)1917, that will eventually spread to China, the (Leopard)1949 and end up in Europe, the (Lion) in the end days (Rev.13:2). Although Yeltsin ruled Russia for appox eight yrs. He only ruled under Communist Russia a short space (few mos) of that time. He continued a short space (Rev.17:10) under the communist system. Although the eighth was and is not (Rev.17:11) of the beast, he is of the beast, and as its ruler is a beast. Just as the President of America is the President, he is also a native, an american. The Word states; the eighth (Putin) is of the seven (Yeltsin) (Rev.17:11) for he was set up by Yeltsin. The eighth 8. Putin (Medvedev is Putin’s puppet) and he (Putin) is not now of that system, although he once was of the system. Putin as the eighth shall revive (bring to life) that communist system, that head (Administration) (Rev.13:3). Yet, this man is not the anti-christ but he is the son of perdition (Rev.17:11, 2 Thess.2:3). He rules only 42 mos. (Rev.13:5) time of Jacob’s trouble, (Dan.7:5) (3 and one half yrs), (3 ribs), as the world power (Rev.13:7). At the end of this time (Jacob’s Trouble) THEN, THEN, THEN comes the beginning of the seven year tribulations, Jacob’s Trouble ( The Lord’s Wrath) is before Tribulations not the last half of it.. Why? does the beast become the world power of nations (Rev:13:7); Because he destroys the World Power of nations (Rev.17:15) and takes her place (Dan.7:5) (Rev 6:17). She, BABYLON (the whore) ruled over (rode upon) and controlled the Beast’s activities (Rev.17:3-5) as the World power; but in the end the Beast destroys, devours (Dan.7:5) and burns her (Rev.17:16) and her great city Babylon, the world power of cities (Rev.18). That is the difference of the two Babylons in (Rev.17 and 18) BABYLON (capital letters) stands for the world power of nations and Babylon (small letters) the world power of cities. In God’s eyes the word Babylon means the world power at the time. So one moment in God’s Word a place or name may be referring to one nation by one name then later that name will be hidden and be referred to as Babylon because then (in that next chapter of God’s Word) it is the world power! That is why some of Jer. and Ezek. is difficult to understand and misinterpreted by all. Now observe the Scriptures carefuly as to what they say. The son of perdition must first be taken out of the way, by the leopard (Dan.7:6) (2 Thess.2:3,7) THEN shall that anti-christ (WICKED) be revealed who shall be destroyed by the brightness of his coming (2 Thess.2:8). Scripture reveals the son of perdition and the anti-christ are two separate individuals!

    The four beast in (Dan.7:3-8) are the last four world powers in the latter days into the end days. They read backwards as well as does the seals in (Rev.8,7,6). That is why the Word ask a question (Rev.6:17) to something that has not yet commenced in (Rev.6;2-16), but men would have you believe otherwise through their understanding. they believe that 6:2 is the beginning of the seals. Yet, it is actually the end. You do not run to the mountains to hide in Rev.6:15-16 if the wrath of the LORD ALREADY TOOK PLACE IN V 13-14. Why hide then; its over! you hide in the beginning and so God’s Word is revealing that that is what is taking place in (Rev6:17) the beginning. The beginning of Rev.6 starts in v17 backwards! And so does much of God’s Word read backwards (Isa.46:10) from last to first, in the order of its time. (Dan.7:3-8) United States, Russia, ( the bear rises upon it side, it attacks the world power from the north) (In Ezek.38-39) Gog attacks the (land and people) of Israel. the land of the free, no bars, no gates, no walls (Ezek.38;11); not the little Nation of Israel. Russia shall have ten nations to help her! WHY? Because Gog is afraid of the World Power! Gog does not go down to attack but up! Up! UP! (Ezek.39:11,16) from the North, not DOWN from the north! China,( four stars of its (flag) beneath its large star symbolic of four wings and four heads from backwards to forwards its flag in the wind) Finally, the Kingdom of anti-christ and its end (Dan.7:1-8).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s